Skip to content

Explainer 03 · 7 scenes · about 5 min

Your voice, not a robot’s

A style card built from 3 to 10 of the owner’s own past replies. See a generic reply and a reply in the owner’s voice side by side, and how Shiva measures the difference.

Hands on: Pick which past replies teach the voice, compare the before and after, and add a word the owner never wants to see.

Illustration: a homestay owner in a shawl sits on her verandah steps reading her phone, a folded letter and a small diya beside her.
Fictional example

Example Homestay · style card

Warmth
5 / 5
Formality
2 / 5
Sentences
short
Script
Roman · Hindi mix 0%
Emoji
none
Sign-off
— Meera and family
Her phrases
“Do come back”
Stance
Say sorry plainly; never argue in public.
Never use
(none yet)

In setup, an owner with no past replies starts from a voice pack and these two sliders.

  1. 01 / 07

    A style card, not a vibe

    “Write like me” is too vague for a model to hold on to. So Shiva writes the voice down as a style card: how warm, how formal, how long the sentences, how much Hindi in the mix, which script, emoji or not, the owner’s own sign-off and phrases, words never to use, and the business’s stance on things like refunds.

    Each of these is a separate dial, which research found gives finer control than one “write like X” instruction.

  2. 02 / 07

    Taught by 3 to 10 of your own replies

    In setup the owner pastes a few replies they have written before, and ticks a box agreeing they may be used as examples. Shiva keeps up to ten.

    With fewer than three, there isn’t enough to measure a voice against, and the voice check says “not run” rather than guessing.

  3. 03 / 07

    Before: a reply anyone could have written

    Here is a reply to Rohit as a generic AI tool might write it. It is polite, and it could have come from any hotel anywhere.

    Shiva’s rule check flags the stock phrases, like “we are thrilled” and “world-class”, and the voice score sits below the line. A study of Indian and American writers found AI suggestions pulled Indian writers toward Western styles; this is the pull Shiva pushes back on.

  4. 04 / 07

    After: in Meera’s voice

    The same answer in Meera’s own way: short sentences, thanks first, plain words, her “Do come back”, her sign-off.

    No stock phrases, and the voice score is well above the line. Both replies on this page were written by hand to show the difference; the scores are computed live by Shiva’s own voice check.

  5. 05 / 07

    How “sounds like you” is measured

    The voice check ignores what a reply is about and looks at how it is written: sentence length, commas and exclamation marks, capitals, emoji, script, and how often common little words like “so”, “very”, “we” and “ji” appear. Measuring style without topic is what makes this a voice score, not a topic score.

    The score is shown to the owner and never blocks Approve. Its line is a starting choice that will be tuned on real owners’ replies.

  6. 06 / 07

    Past replies teach voice, never facts

    An old reply might mention an old price. Past replies are kept as voice examples only, and the draft can’t cite them. If a draft copied “₹2,800” from one, the fact check would block it, because the fact sheet now says ₹3,200.

    The card is also sent again with every part of the draft, because a model slowly slips back to a generic voice within a few turns of a long chat.

    For the curious

    Researchers call this persona drift.

  7. 07 / 07

    Words you never want

    Every owner has words they dislike: “property”, “valued guest”, a competitor’s name. Put them on the card and any draft that uses one is blocked until it is fixed.

    Try “soon” on the stage: Meera’s own reply uses it, and the rule check catches it at once. Next: approving with a tap, and the receipt it leaves.

In plain words

The short version

  1. The owner’s voice is written down as a style card: separate dials for warmth, formality, length, Hindi mix and script, plus their sign-off, phrases, stance and banned words.

  2. It learns from 3 to 10 of the owner’s own past replies, used only with their consent and only as voice examples, never as facts.

  3. Stock AI and Western marketing phrases are flagged by the rule check, and banned words block a draft.

  4. A voice score compares how a draft is written, not what it says, with the owner’s replies. It informs the owner and never blocks.

For the curious: sources and technical terms

Sources

Where this comes from

  1. AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances

    Agarwal, Naaman, Vashistha, CHI · 2025 · 118 participants from India and the US

  2. StyleRemix: Interpretable Authorship Obfuscation via Distillation and Perturbation of Style Elements

    Fisher, Hallinan, Lu, et al., EMNLP · 2024 · explicit style axes

  3. Measuring and Controlling Instruction (In)Stability in Language Model Dialogs

    Li, Liu, Bashkansky, et al., COLM · 2024 · persona drift within 8 rounds

  4. Same Author or Just Same Topic? Towards Content-Independent Style Representations

    Wegmann, Schraagen, Nguyen, RepL4NLP at ACL · 2022

  5. Catch Me If You Can? Not Yet: LLMs Still Struggle to Imitate the Implicit Writing Styles of Everyday Authors

    Wang, Tripto, Park, Li, Zhou, Findings of EMNLP · 2025 · informal voices are the hardest

  6. Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users’ Views

    Jakesch, Bhat, Buschek, Zalmanson, Naaman, CHI · 2023 · why the stance is the business’s, not the model’s

Fictional example

Meera, her past replies and both replies to Rohit are fictional and written by hand for this page. The voice score and the rule check run live in your browser with Shiva’s own code and rule lists. Nothing you type is sent anywhere.